|
Member Review - Rudel Gurken : 09-Dec-2006 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
The designers tried to make the -5S more suited to close combat situations without sacrificing too much from its LRM firepower.
Due to the artemis the average number of LRM's hitting is almost the same and the short range weaponry can threaten enemies straying to close.
It has even enough heat sinks to defend itself up close while keeping its LRM's raining down at opponents far away. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - DarkAdder : 03-Jul-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
Okay, we've added Artemis and made the LRMs bigger, but at the cost of the (meger) lasers. Im not sure if this is a good trade or not. Granted the SRMs have a longer range than the small lasers, and deal more damage. But the lasers werent an ammo-dependant weapon.
Again, this mech does its best work by hanging back from the heavy fighting and raining on someones parade.
Not the best upgrade Ive seen. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - mud : 04-Nov-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
This is not so good; except for the ammo capacity and armor, an Archer is every bit as good. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Steel-Scorpion : 09-Dec-2003 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
Ok, this varient is not bad, but the design team needed to stuff the ammo in the CASE locations... instead of way out on the arm...
otherwise a good support mech. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|