|
Member Review - Rudel Gurken : 17-Mar-2019 07:49 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
A dangerous shortrange-fighter with much unused potential. Instead of a full ton of MG-ammo a CASE would have been better. I don“t like MASC (even if able to give it some brutal speed, its something personal) so i would upgrade the mediums to pulses instead. But so as it is it would give opponents bad dreams about a 45t backbiter. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 27-Sep-2007 20:03 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
An interesting short range fighter. It keeps the original weapons layout, but it still has too much ammo for the machine guns. The pulse laser works well as a weapon for scout hunting, replacing the range with accuracy. Unfortunately modern scouts tend to be more than able to evade 6/9/6 machine, even if the MASC is engaged. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Blackhand : 28-Jan-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
Better than Marik's version because it won't blow up because of heat. But at the same time it suffers from the same problems the old Shadow Hawks had. Too many heat sinks and not enough fire power.
Compared to the Davion and the Kurita versions this mech is pretty much wall paper unless you need something to beef up your Stinger/Wasp patrols. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - mud : 02-Nov-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
They should switch out one of those machine guns for another AMS; the Large Pulse Laser just does not give this enough ranged punch though. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - ralgith : 20-Apr-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
Ok comprimise between the 3D/3K and the 3M, but I still prefer either the 3D or 3K, especially since they downgraded the MPLs to MLs |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|