|
Member Review - Rudel Gurken : 23-Mar-2019 05:51 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
A true multi purpose mech in all aspects. Fast and jumpcapable with a versatile weapons mix but some light armor so don´t try to slug it out with heavier opponents. An oddity here: The UAC-ammo that goes through very fast is CASEd but that 200 shots of MG-ammo aren´t. Solve this by tading 100 shots for a second CASE or try to move the ammo to the right torso while beefing up the armor by half a ton. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 11-Aug-2007 22:22 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
1.50 |
| Comment: |
Not a good idea. Using the XL engine made the 'Mech vulnerable and expensive. I'm not sure whether even Stainers could afford such upgrades. The armor, barely sufficient for standard engined variant is severely lacking here and MASC while occasionally useful prevents older models from being upgraded this way since it requires dismantling leg musculature IMO. Again too much ammo for single machine gun and too few rounds for the UAC (just a coincidence that the Sentinel, Hermes II and a few others had the same problem?). This all makes it below average, it can be used, but there is too much unnecessarily wasted potential. Another 3050 botch. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Blackhand : 20-Sep-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
This mech is strictly run of the mill average. XL and thin armour is a risky combo for any design. Using the extra tonnage for a UAC 5 and only 1 ton of ammo was a mistake though.
It doesn't kill fast enough to justify the fact it has an XL, most opponents will breach its armour by round 3. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - StarCommander_One-Eye : 22-Aug-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
A good jack of all trades but master of none, i like this Vulcan for scouting and light to medium mech attkers.It also has that MG and flamer for them infantry |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - ralgith : 20-Apr-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
Good variant here, I agree with the swiss army mech comment made previously, however I'd drop a 1/2 ton of MG ammo for a second MG, not armor :D |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|