|
Member Review - mud : 21-Oct-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
I'm not certain why they insist on designing LRM configs. of all the light omnis, they really are not all that effective. This one is no exception. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - DarkAdder : 14-Jan-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
1.50 |
| Comment: |
Not all that great. Scrap one of the LRMs and half the ammo and rebuild it. The LRMs will still deal significant damage, but the flamer (in and of itself) is not a good back up weapon, unless you want to roast marshmallows. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Motown Scrapper : 11-Oct-2003 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
This mech has good speed and a decent jump but the armour is weak.the Twin LRM 10s give some marginal fire support capability and there is more ammo than it needs.The flamer is a weak back-up weapon.Agood idea would be to drop half the ammo and add two ER medium lasers |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Daphne Wilde : 02-Oct-2003 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
Never liked "hanky's" and here is a reason why. at first glance this looks like a pretty good machine, then you studdy it a bit and see the holes in the design. ( and you if you run it with this armor, thats an easy 'read') touch here and there ccan fix most of the flaws, wich is why it still gets a duce and a half |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|