|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 14-Jun-2008 22:47 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
I must agree with Knightrunner about the ER PPC. It seems that it was replaced with standard model as an afterthought, because the heat dissipation system is clearly projected for higher heat output than current weapons can produce, or did you actually work with standard heat sinks at first? Dropping two heat sinks for more LRM ammo would also increase the longevity of the Siege in battle. Otherwise the 'Mech looks fine, although it doesn't rise too much above the average. |
| A topic has been started for this review [Read Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Knightrunner : 16-Apr-2008 18:03 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
Reminds me somewhat of the Highlander, but without JJ's and with a certain weakness at close range. Plenty of armor and runs cool even with an engine hit. Unfortunately, it might find itself out-gunned by other assaults in 3060- at long or short range.
I think this mech would be vastly improved by replacing the PPC with an ER version- it can easily handle the heat, this would help cover the mech at point blank range, and the longer range meshes better with the LRM's and Gauss for long-range fighting (this mech's stated purpose). |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|