|
Member Review - Rudel Gurken : 03-Mar-2008 11:32 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
The needed total disassembly of the mech to get an ES chassis is quite a problem for me. But i can see the use of a better protected Centurion without that dangerous XL-engine of the 3050 model. The standard AC plus its voluminous ammo bin makes this a well liked model for Davion special ammo fetishists!
All in all the speed and SW-aera weapons place it in the garrison or periphery category.
I like it but i think it won't have much chance against most modern mediums. |
| A topic has been started for this review [Read Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - mud : 12-Feb-2008 17:42 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
I'm not certain that I buy the idea that units are going to rebuild their old Centurions with endo steel just to add a ton of ammunition and CASE. We're not talking about a field modification here, but about completely tearing down and rebuilding the entire 'mech. This would probably cost close to a million c-bills in man-hours alone.
While I appreciate that the fluff doesn't just say, "They upgraded the 'mech to endo steel", as too many people try to say, I'm just not buying this idea. |
| A topic has been started for this review [Read Topic] |
|
|
|
|
Autocannon/10
5. Endo Steel 5. Sensors 5.
Autocannon/10
6. Endo Steel 6. Life Support 6.
Autocannon/10
5. Empty 5. Endo Steel
6. Empty 6. Endo Steel
Left Torso Center Torso Right Torso
1. Heat Sink 1. Fusion Engine 1. Heat Sink
2.
Write Review