|
Member Review - mud : 26-Oct-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
Very impressive long-range firepower here, and the toughness to survive intense counter-battery fire. I'd use this as a siege engine in situations where you don't want to rely on vehicles for LRM fire because there is a high probability of attracting enemy fire. In a relatively static battle it could serve as a good fire-support lynchpin, with other units deployed to guard its flanks; in other words, use it the same way you would use an Awesome and it will be fine, with the added caveat of having a lance of J-27s on hand to support it. Just make sure you position it in a good firing position from the beginning, because you do not have the speed to reposition quickly. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Erenon : 24-Oct-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
This was probably done to stress out the publishing system.
However, as a viable mech, it it's just too ammo dependant. of course.. this also means that this mech is perfect for laying thunder minefields.. *ahem*
However, its slow and once its ammunition runs out.. very much dead. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 23-Oct-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
strange design, it seems to be variations on as many weapons as possible on chassis. It's very slow,so only defensive operations will see it. It can overheat a lot if it uses all LRMs and it lacks short range backup, small laser is too short ranged and weak to cover LRM weakness. Ammo load is sufficient, but far from exceptional for longer missions. If LRM 10 was replaced with something else, for example heat sink and large laser (or some mediums and ammo), would be much more useful. As it stands it's flawed walking pillbox. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - bladewind : 23-Oct-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
I have to agree with Dragon. Drop the LRM-10 for a few lasers or something. Unless the designer delibrately want the mech to be flawed and i think that was his intention.
|
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
LRM 10 5. Sensors 5.
LRM 10 6. Life Support 6.
LRM 15
Write Review