|
Member Review - mud : 28-Aug-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
Operationally very similar to a Locust, but not as robust, which can be a limitation.
With it's SRM launcher I'd use this primarily for incendiary duty.
I'd also strip a few points of armor from the head and beef up the torsos a bit. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Motown Scrapper : 20-Aug-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
I like the speed though it could use more armour. With it's quad configuration I would station this mech in artic regions where the added stability could give it a distinct advantage. A usefull variant would drop the SRM for more armour. Over all a useful design for it's era. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Khayman : 17-Aug-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
I completely agree with Sleeping Dragon. I'm embarresed to say this but I didn't even realize it was a quad. -_-
I thought that the mech was already decent but the quad, IMO, I thought was a nice touch. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 10-Aug-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
Nice mech, quite similar to the Locust, but even with this climbing equipment mentioned fluff it isn't too well suited for rough terrain, especially when you may be ambushed easily and weak armor won't save you. 0.5 point up for being quad :) |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|