|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 04-May-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
Firestarter is usually quite noisy mech. Stealth helps it close on enemy, but those ER smalls doesn't make sense to me. I would be more happy with BAP, one more flamer and two standard mediums instead of this weapon mix. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Motown Scrapper : 19-Apr-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
A tad on the slow side and the armour is good but not great stealth is a definate plus.But it does run warm and the weapon load out is definatly optimized for close in .It would give infantry fits,but would be hard pressed if confronted by other mechs or heavy armour |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Seraph : 18-Apr-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
This is no longer a Firestarter. Removal of half it's flamers reduces it's inceenadary effectiveness by half. The addition of stealth armor is a big plus, but the inclusion of so many ER lasers is a big minus. Still has decent speed and good armor coverage though. And perhaps a swap from ECM to a probe. May help with figring out which clump of woods to torch first, the ones with the troops hiding in them. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
Double Heat Sink 2. Fusion Engine 2.
Double Heat Sink 3. Fusion Engine 3.
Double Heat Sink 4. Fusion Engine 4.
Write Review