|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 18-Apr-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
Dangerous and durable design with high potential. Active probe and ECM suite, flamers, thick armor, good weapons. I may babble something about JJs, but this is too good. With different name (and 0.5 more standard armor, or light TAG instead of second flamer) I would give it 0.5 more, because I like missile Commandos. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Blackhand : 20-Mar-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
Not sold on the idea of a back biter design that doesn't use JJ to get to its target.
Its still a good design. Solid armour, standard engine, good heat disapation unless you alpha. The ECM and Active Suite are nice touches. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Motown Scrapper : 26-Feb-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
Not bad. You have decent speed full armour and a good weapon load.I like the Electronics load as well.It does run a little warm but all in all a good close in fighter.Would be especialy effective against infantry supported by vehicles |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Oafman : 24-Feb-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
Dang that is a lot of firepower for a 25 ton mech! This does 1.16 points of damage per ton and still goes 7-11. Definately want this on my side. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|