|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 16-Jun-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
Replacing AC/10 with RAC is good idea and additional armor is fine. I would use one ton for more standard armor rather than for another laser, but otherwise its fine.
(wrong year had been already mentioned) |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Blackhand : 20-Apr-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
Its a good refit. I like the idea that every unit that has Enforcers will now have multiple upgrade options. This being the simplest but not neccesarily the best.
The standard engine and RAC I love.
The heat sinks I'm happy with, since your not going to jump jet and fire too many RAC shells, so your heat should do fine.
Armour and jump jets are perfect in my mind. Two compliants though. Its got back armour now.
My Panther would actually have to work hard against an opposing Enforcer now. Good work.
Though the time period is wrong as well. I also dislike the weird way the Enforcer works. The closer it gets to you the LESS lethal it is, at least compared to other designs who gain more firepower as they close with you. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - jymset : 03-Mar-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
I don't know, I have problems with this one. And I don't mean you forgetting to set the year-scale to the correct post-civil war time! ;)
No, I don't buy Davion refitting 3025-vintage Enforcers with RAC5s in 3067. I mean, by that time it had received a major upgrade in 3050 and a successor model in the Enforcer-III.
I realise that you wanted to to give a good reason for retaining a standard engine, but it didn't really work for me, especially when the rest of the 'mech got upgraded quite a bit.
I do like that it has real back armour now (even though that *is* defeatist!) and the touch with the standard medium laser. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Warhammer: 3025 : 15-Feb-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
4.50 |
| Comment: |
Very nice! An almost complete retrofit of the original. Better range, firepower, staying capacity...this 'mech seems to have the complete package!
Seems to. There is one little niggle: heat efficiency. True, the heat can be managed through fire discipline, but I would rather sacrifice the Medium Laser for another Heat Sink.
Sidenote: The Enforcer has always been one of my favorite 'mechs, ever since my introduction to it in the beginning of Battletech: The Crescent Hawk's Revenge. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
ER Large Laser 4. Medium Laser 4.
ER Large Laser 5. Sensors 5.
Rotary AC/5
6.
Write Review