|
Member Review - tom kazansky : 12-Jan-2007 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
The Violator. The name alone should earn this mech a "5." Aside from the great name this is a pretty solid mech, and a great improvement over the dissapointing Mauler in TRO 3050. I like the efficiency of this mech, it deals with heat quite well and has two distinct weapons groups for short and long range that optimizes heat output and tonnage. Plus it doesn't have an XL engine, which means it's cheap and durable.
I could see this mech violating quite a few opponents. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 21-Jan-2006 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
Well, nice weapons, though and it can deal with heat, but... wait a minute... isn't that some Stalker clone? (To rating - I like Stalkers) |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - bladewind : 13-Feb-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
Overall a fairly uninspired (imo) design that can be good as a work horse front line assault mech.
The tech is mostly low tech aside from the ERLL and the CASE which makes a very economical choice plus its a great meat shield. 8 medium lasers and dual SRM-6s is always nasty upclose. Shred the armor with the lasers and let the SRM-6s go crit crazy !
The only niggle i have is that how come the Artemis IV is mounted in the head ? Every single LRM / SRM launcher MUST have their Artemis mounted at the same location where the launcher is.
Plus its one launcher per Artemis. So if u have 2 LRM-10s u need 2 Artemis. Swapping the Dual LRM-10s for a single 20 and combo it with the Artemis would be a better choice.
|
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|