|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 19-Jul-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
This variant seems to be more effective than original and it has more fighting options thanks to the jump jets. The 1C dropped some LRM ammo, so the pilot will be more compelled to close on the enemy, but thats just minor flaw (The XL engine is necessary for this firepower, and I decided to ignore the cost because it will probably reach only units that deserve it = high performance front-line units). |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Blackhand : 20-Mar-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
I'm less sold on this design than others. I'm never one to like XL engines on anything other than heavy and assault mechs. A single bad round against a heavy mech can end your day as they punch through into your torsos and get an engine crit.
Its not likely, but having an IS XL is almost a death sentence every time.
An expensive death sentence to boot.
|
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Wanallo : 03-Mar-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
4.50 |
| Comment: |
A very nice variation on my own chassis, I like the extra mobility the JJ's provide and the LRM10= Artemis is almost as effective as an unaided LRM15.
I can see this guy being part of a light lance in the Davion Light Guards, leading a team of lighter mechs.
Excellent Job StarRaven! |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|