|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 27-Jun-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
If it is an upgrade of 4G than I would use two tons from the AC to add ammo and two tons from the Endo Steel for JJs and half ton to upgrade head mounted laser to ER medium (arm mounted lasers will be ER mediums too). Two heat sinks would be replaced with electronics and heat sinks will be double. And it would be without XL engine and Ferro fibrous armor. Abilities would be similar to this variant but the cost will be lower. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Blackhand : 10-Mar-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
Well actually, I'd rather have the IIC, than this hunk of junk. Sure its only got ammo for 5 rounds rather than this one's 15. But by sheer odds your going to jam them at some point with 15 chances. so the IIC is better in my mind.
The medium pulses are okay, but you needed the extra range on this design so ER would have made more sense.
Go wtih just a straight Hunchback IIC If you want to field a clan one. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Karagin : 28-Feb-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
Okay seeing how there is a IIC of the Hunchback already why would we need a C version?
Not to sound harsh or mean but you more or less reinvented the wheel with this one. Nothing really new or different and the IIC has dual UAC20s so you get more out of it. Yours has more ECM, but given that the Clans dont use ECM that much it's a waste of space. Granted it would make sense for all the mechs to have ECM and other things, but not in BT's logic and take on things.
It would be interesting to see this mech against the IIC Hunchback in a fight though. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|