|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 02-Oct-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
1.00 |
| Comment: |
Weird mech, I don't think that anyone would build mech for tunnel fighting, especially mech with XL engine (inefficient XL engine). Only positive on this beast would be it's the armor, but otherwise the weapons are quite weak for heavy mech and speed is good only for tunnels (maybe). Why should I use mech in place where vehicles are in obvious advantage (low profile, ...)?
1 point for concept and armor. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Knightrunner : 30-Aug-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
How very, very odd. Not much for standard combat, but it makes a very well defended artillery piece. Sure it's slow, but any light mech that makes it to the rear to do a little "counter-battery fire" will be in for a nasty surprise. I'm not sure I'd use an XL for an artillery piece, but the surprise value alone is worth something. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - mud : 19-Oct-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
Well, it's unique. Slow as all get-up, but it carries strong armor and an "interesting" weapons load. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
Thumper 5. Sensors 5.
Thumper 6. Life Support 6.
Autocannon/10
6.
Write Review