|
Member Review : 16-Sep-2005 00:00 |
|
|
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Devastator DVS-2 |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
Probably my favorite Assault mech of all time. The Best looks and just amazingly deadly. Though I would like more ammo for it its not bad. I like the fact that if your in a really nasty firefight and take a engine hit you can still keep up a withering barrage. Heck even with 2 engine hits you can still put a hurtin' on someone. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 16-Sep-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Lineholder KW1-LH2 |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
My second favorite of the 55 ton machines. (shadowhawk being my favorite.) Love the weapons load, armor and the look. My only complaint is the lack of double heat sinks. I would personally drop 4 hs for 10 double and am not really sure Its a 80K difference but frees up enough tonnage for more armor and something else. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 30-Jun-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
L1-S1 Lightningbolt |
| Rating: |
1.00 |
| Comment: |
Umm ok 5 out of 5 for speed.
But 1 out of 5 for fluff. If this was a clan only design then great but it uses clan tech in its entirety and was designed and manufactured in the federated suns. I just dont see them having enough of the spare part laying around to make 2 full lances. I have also never really liked the light Tag.
But that is just me. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 30-Jun-2005 00:00 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Gaijin A |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
Ok I am going against all of the negative comments and looking at this mech for what it is.
IT'S A FREAKING SCOUT NOT A MINI ASSULT, I have to admit I am really tired of seeing "oh well it sucks because it only has one weapon and cant fight at all."
Guess what THIS does the job of ELECTRONICS WARFARE and does it VERY VERY well I might add. Will it need to avoid battles. Yup and it should be anyway. Can it take down a assult? Yup With an 8-12-8 it should be able to take down an assult just like a 8-12 locust. But that is NOT its job.
But then I have a problem with the concept of using lights to hunt assults anyway. Looking at the modern military you wouldnt willingly send a GI into a tank fight and think that is and should be the norm.
Now granted I will agree that the TSM is a waste here I would replace it with either masc or null sig (but that would make it a lvl 3 mech), but othe3r than that small problem this mech is almost perfect for its INTENDED ROLL. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 30-Jun-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Cheetah CHT-1A |
| Rating: |
4.50 |
| Comment: |
Well this mech certinly follows its intended role, (not sure why this scored so high versus a mech that has the same overall job description Gaijin A just needs to have the TSM removed to be as good but earned a 1.75 over all rateing).
Anyway its a neat design with amazing speed. Very nice. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 27-Jun-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 1 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Wakizashi WKI-3X |
| Rating: |
1.50 |
| Comment: |
I have to agree with Blackhand on this one. The TSM is rarely going to be active (and last I checked its Davion only) which makes it a waste. The Targeting comp is nice but as stated by others not a DCMS item. (a little fluff can change and or explain that though). other wise tis a design with some potential. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
